Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notices and assessment orders issued under Section 29(4) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 were valid when no individual notice was served and only general notice was published on the department's website.
Analysis: The assessments were completed beyond the three-year period prescribed under Section 29(4), and the matter turned on the mode of service required for invoking the assessment power. The applicable rule was held to require service of an individual notice as a condition precedent, and a general notice or website publication was held insufficient for that purpose. In the absence of individual notice, the assessment procedure was treated as defective and the resultant assessment orders were held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The notices and assessment orders were invalid and void for want of individual notice.
Final Conclusion: The petitions succeeded and the impugned assessment proceedings could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute and rules require individual notice as a condition for invoking the assessment power, substituted general notice or website publication does not satisfy the mandatory requirement and any assessment made without such notice is void.