1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal overturns disallowance of expenses, citing detailed breakdown and supporting documentation.</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of expenses made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found the ad hoc ... - Issues involved: Appeal against CIT(A)'s order disallowing expenses u/s 143(3) for Asstt. Year 2005-06.Details of the Judgment:Issue 1: Disallowance of expensesThe AO disallowed 1/3rd of total expenses of &8377; 12,96,230 incurred by the assessee due to lack of supporting vouchers. The assessee explained that the vouchers were missing. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision. The assessee, a partnership firm in management consultancy, provided detailed expenses breakdown including establishment, repairs, staff welfare, telephone, tours, and vehicle running. Payments were made by cheques and cash, with names of recipients provided. The AO did not verify the expenses' genuineness despite details being furnished. The Tribunal found the ad hoc disallowance unjustified and deleted it, allowing the appeal.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of expenses made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).