Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be interfered with on the ground that no personal hearing was afforded before confirmation of the demand, and whether the writ petition should be entertained despite the availability of an appellate remedy.
Analysis: The notice proposed assessment and invited written objections with supporting documents within the stipulated time, while also indicating that a personal hearing would be given for objections, if any. The petitioner did not show that a request for personal hearing was made in the reply or in any subsequent communication before the assessing officer. The petitioner had also invoked section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 by way of rectification, but the Court noted that the order had already been passed and that the petitioner had an appellate remedy. In these circumstances, the Court declined to interfere in writ jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The challenge based on denial of personal hearing was rejected and the assessment order was allowed to stand.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained on merits and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal remedy.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a pre-assessment notice provides an opportunity to file objections and seek hearing, a party who does not request personal hearing cannot later succeed on a complaint of denial of hearing, particularly when an effective appellate remedy is available.