TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amounts transferred by the Hindu undivided family to the minor daughters amounted to a gift within the meaning of section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, or were in discharge of the family's legal obligation and part of a family arrangement. (ii) Whether the interest credited on the amounts placed with the family business was allowable as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (iii) Whether the amounts standing to the credit of the daughters, together with accretions, were includible in the net wealth of the assessee.
Issue (i): Whether the amounts transferred by the Hindu undivided family to the minor daughters amounted to a gift within the meaning of section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, or were in discharge of the family's legal obligation and part of a family arrangement.
Analysis: The transfers were found to have been made from the family's capital account to the separate credit of each daughter in order to make provision for their maintenance and marriage. The factual finding recorded below was that the sums were given in discharge of the family's legal obligation towards the daughters. On that footing, the transfer was not a gratuitous disposition but a transfer with consideration. The reference to family arrangement was also supportable on the facts as found.
Conclusion: The transfer did not amount to a gift and was not chargeable to gift-tax.
Issue (ii): Whether the interest credited on the amounts placed with the family business was allowable as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The amounts remained with the family business as deposits and the business credited interest on them. Since the funds were used in the business and the interest was paid on those funds, the statutory requirement of interest on capital borrowed for business purposes was satisfied. The contention that there was no borrowal was rejected on the facts found.
Conclusion: The interest was allowable as a deduction under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (iii): Whether the amounts standing to the credit of the daughters, together with accretions, were includible in the net wealth of the assessee.
Analysis: Once the transfer to the daughters was treated as a valid transfer for consideration and not as the family's own asset, the credited sums and the accrued interest belonged to the daughters and not to the assessee-family. Such amounts could therefore not be treated as assets forming part of the family's net wealth.
Conclusion: The amounts were not includible in the net wealth of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: All the referred questions were answered in favour of the assessee, with the gift-tax, income-tax, and wealth-tax disputes decided against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer by a Hindu undivided family to its daughters, made in discharge of a legal obligation and supported by consideration, is not a gift; amounts so transferred and retained in the business as deposits can support deduction of interest and are not includible in the transferor's net wealth.
TaxTMI 
