TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court grants relief to Income Tax Assessee, clarifies authority of Commissioner of Income Tax.</h1> <h3>Dr. Pratima Venkatachalam Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), & Income Tax Officer,</h3> Dr. Pratima Venkatachalam Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), & Income Tax Officer, - TMI Issues:1. Stay petition filed by the petitioner before the Assessment Officer was dismissed.2. Appeal filed by the petitioner before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the assessment order.3. Impugned demand notice issued by the Assessment Officer for a specific amount.4. Challenge to the order dated 14.08.2015 through a writ petition before the High Court.Stay Petition Dismissal:The petitioner, an Income Tax Assessee, filed an original return for the assessment year 2009-2010, which was later re-opened, leading to the filing of a stay petition before the Assessment Officer. However, the stay petition was dismissed. Subsequently, an appeal was made before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the assessment order, with another stay petition filed during the appeal process. Despite the pending stay petition, the Assessment Officer issued a demand notice for a significant amount on 14.08.2015, prompting the petitioner to challenge this action through a writ petition.Commissioner's Power to Pass Stay Order:During the proceedings, it was contended that the Commissioner lacked the authority to pass a stay order. However, it was clarified that the Appellate Commissioner does possess the power to modify, set aside, or issue any order concerning the demand. Therefore, it was established that the Commissioner, without concluding the matter, holds sufficient incidental power to annul any order while the appeal is pending. This clarification led to the setting aside of the impugned order dated 14.08.2015 by the Assessment Officer, directing the Commissioner to decide on the stay petition within four weeks from the date of the court's order.Conclusion:The High Court, after considering the arguments and legal provisions, ruled in favor of the petitioner. The impugned order issued by the Assessment Officer was set aside, and the Commissioner of Income Tax was instructed to address the stay petition within a stipulated timeframe. Consequently, the writ petition was granted without costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed as well.
TaxTMI 