Tribunal Upholds Cost Plus Method in Transfer Pricing Appeal

The appeal challenging the determination of arm's length price under section 92CA(3) for the assessment year 2002-03, focusing on the Cost Plus Method vs. Transaction Net Margin Method for international transactions, was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) in favor of the assessee, confirming the use of the Cost Plus Method as appropriate based on functions performed, OECD guidelines, and past acceptance by the Transfer Pricing Officer. The addition made by the TPO was not upheld, and the CIT(A)'s order was found to have no infirmity.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The appeal challenges the order of CIT(A) regarding the determination of arm's length price u/s 92CA(3) for the assessment year 2002-03, focusing on the Cost Plus Method vs. Transaction Net Margin Method for international transactions.

Details of the Judgment:

Issue 1: Cost Plus Method vs. Transaction Net Margin Method
1. The assessee, a subsidiary of L'Oreal SA France, engaged in manufacturing and distribution of cosmetics, used Cost Plus Method for purchase of raw materials. TPO applied TNMM, rejecting CPM, and made an addition of &8377;1,99,00,000.
2. Assessee contended that as a contract manufacturer with less risk, CPM was appropriate. It earned 83.66% gross margin on input cost, higher than comparable companies' 59%.
3. CIT(A) found CPM appropriate, as it focuses on functions performed, not product types. OECD guidelines prefer methods based on gross margin. TPO accepted CPM in subsequent years.
4. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision, stating that CPM was proper, as it aligns with functions performed, OECD guidelines, and past acceptance by TPO. No infirmity found in CIT(A)'s order.

Conclusion:
The appeal of the revenue is dismissed, confirming the CIT(A)'s decision in favor of the assessee regarding the Cost Plus Method for determining arm's length price in international transactions.

---