Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner's order revising the assessments under section 33B was vitiated for breach of natural justice because some materials used in support of the disclosed grounds were collected behind the assessee's back and were not specifically put to her.
Analysis: The notice under section 33B disclosed the essential grounds on which revision was proposed, namely, want of proper enquiry, doubtful residence and business, and the alleged erroneous assessments made by the Income-tax Officer. The assessee was therefore aware of the case she had to meet. The Commissioner was entitled to make enquiries for the purposes of revision, and he could use the results of such enquiries if they were only supporting materials for a ground already disclosed. The order was not based exclusively on undisclosed basic materials. The disclosed grounds were independently supported by materials appearing in the record and by the assessee's own admissions in the reply to the notice. The use of some undisclosed materials did not, in the circumstances, vitiate the entire order. The notice and opportunity given were held sufficient to satisfy the requirements of section 33B and the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The challenge to the revisional order on the ground of breach of natural justice failed, and the order of revision was sustained.