Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether conversion of DEEC shipping bills into drawback shipping bills was permissible in law on the facts of the case.
Analysis: The weight of the exported goods had been checked and certified at the time of export, and the same weight appeared in the invoice, shipping bill and ARE-1, so the objection based on the drawback scheme being weight-based could not stand. The duplicate advance licence produced by the assessee was not shown to be non-genuine, so the objection based on belated production also failed. The Board circular relied upon by the department did not bar individual consideration on merits and facts, and the statutory power under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 permitted amendment of export documents on the basis of documentary evidence existing at the time of export.
Conclusion: Conversion of the shipping bills was held to be legally permissible, and the rejection of the request was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded and the impugned rejection was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where documentary evidence existing at the time of export establishes the relevant particulars, amendment of export documents under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 may be allowed, and a circular cannot be read to exclude such statutory discretion on merits.