Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The assessee challenged the CIT(A)'s order which restricted the deduction u/s 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Captive Power Generating Unit (CPGU). The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 35,18,06,526, but the AO allowed only Rs. 5,04,78,555, disallowing Rs. 30,13,28,171. The AO based the disallowance on the market value of electricity, using the rate at which surplus power was sold to the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board (UPSEB) instead of the rate at which the Chemical Division purchased electricity from UPSEB.
Issue 2: Determination of Market Value for Electricity Supplied by CPGU to the Chemical DivisionThe AO determined the market value of electricity supplied by the CPGU to the Chemical Division by adopting the sale value at which surplus power was supplied to UPSEB. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, stating that the rule of consistency does not apply if the claim is found incorrect in subsequent years. The CIT(A) observed that the assessee showed inflated turnover and net profit to claim a higher deduction. The Tribunal found that the price at which State Electricity Boards sell electricity to industrial consumers represents the market value. The AO's figures from UPPCL did not represent the open market value, as they were based on statutory parameters for compulsory sale of surplus power.
Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the market value for the purpose of section 80IA(8) should be the price at which electricity is sold to industrial consumers by the State Electricity Board, excluding duties, cess, taxes, etc. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal in principle but directed the AO to recompute the deduction u/s 80IA, excluding electricity duty, cess, taxes, etc.
Order:The appeal of the assessee is allowed as indicated above.