TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds CIT(A) decision on TDS disallowance for paper trading firm</h1> <h3>Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle XI, Chennai Versus Nandan Nahar</h3> The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for the ... - Issues involved: Appeal against deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for assessment year 2008-09.Summary:The Revenue appealed against the deletion of disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09. The assessee, engaged in trading paper products, had initially filed a return declaring income of &8377; 9,37,400. The Assessing Officer disallowed an amount of &8377; 28,43,035 under section 40(a)(ia) after finding that TDS was deducted but not remitted to the Government account within the specified date. The CIT(Appeals) observed that the assessee had substantially complied with TDS provisions and that the amendment by Finance Act, 2010 was curative in nature and applicable retrospectively from 01.04.2005. The CIT(Appeals) held that the Assessing Officer's disallowance was not justified as the TDS was remitted within the statutory period, allowing the expenses. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment year 2008-09.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
