Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for valuing unquoted equity shares for gift-tax purposes, the market value should be determined by the yield method rather than the break-up method, and whether the Tribunal was right in declining to refer the question to the High Court.
Analysis: The Court noted that the Supreme Court had already approved the yield method in gift-tax matters and that the later decision relied on by the Revenue concerned valuation under the Wealth-tax Rules, where the break-up method issue arose in a different statutory context. Under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, the central inquiry is whether property has been transferred for inadequate consideration so that the excess over consideration can be treated as a deemed gift. A direct estimation of market value by the break-up method would not, by itself, establish inadequacy of consideration, whereas the yield method remained the appropriate basis in the gift-tax setting.
Conclusion: The Revenue's contention was rejected, and the Tribunal's view applying the yield method was upheld. The reference application was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: In gift-tax valuation of unquoted shares, the yield method continued to govern on the facts presented, and no reference to re-examine that settled position was warranted.
Ratio Decidendi: For gift-tax purposes, unquoted shares are to be valued by the yield method where the issue is adequacy of consideration, and a mere break-up valuation does not establish a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.