Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether metal polishing soap, when sold as a metal polishing agent, is liable to tax at 5% under Entry 67-A(a) of Part-B of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and whether the assessment order levying tax at 14.5% under Entry 67 was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The assessment had classified the product under Entry 67 and applied tax at 14.5%, whereas the petitioner claimed classification under Entry 67-A for abrasives. The clarification issued by the Advance Ruling Committee stated that metal polish soap, if sold as a metal polishing agent, would fall under Entry 67-A(a) as abrasive of all types and attract tax at 5%. In light of that clarification, the assessment order could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The product was held taxable at 5% under Entry 67-A(a), and the impugned assessment order was quashed. The assessing authority was directed to pass a fresh order in accordance with the clarification.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an authoritative clarification under the applicable tax schedule classifies a product under a specific entry, the assessment must conform to that classification and cannot continue under a contrary rate entry.