TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Partial win for Revenue in ITAT appeal on exemption claim delay.</h1> <h3>Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle-V (2), Chennai Versus Polyhose India Pvt. Ltd., Chennai</h3> The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A) order, focusing on the disallowance of the claim of exemption u/s 10B for late ... - Issues involved: Appeal by Revenue against CIT(Appeals) order for assessment year 2008-09 regarding disallowance of claim of exemption u/s 10B for late filing of return of income.Details of the Judgment:1. Grounds of Appeal by Revenue: - Revenue raised grounds against CIT(A) order, contending that the claim of exemption u/s 10B was wrongly allowed due to late filing of return of income. - CIT(A) relied on a decision of ITAT, Delhi Bench, regarding delay in filing without reasonable cause, which Revenue found unacceptable.2. Arguments by Revenue and Assessee: - Revenue argued that the assessee, a manufacturing and trading company, filed the return after the due date, leading to disallowance of deduction u/s 10B by AO. - CIT(A) allowed the appeal based on a decision of ITAT, Delhi Bench, considering the proviso to section 10B(1) as directory, not mandatory. - Revenue had no objection to the issue being sent back to AO for re-examination of the claim of exemption u/s 10B.3. Judgment and Decision: - ITAT Chennai held in favor of the assessee regarding the delay in filing the return of income, following the decision of ITAT, Delhi Bench. - The issue of delay was not to be reconsidered by the Assessing Officer, but the claim of deduction u/s 10B was to be re-adjudicated after granting the assessee a fair hearing. - The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 30/06/2011.This judgment by ITAT Chennai addressed the grounds raised by the Revenue against the CIT(A) order, focusing on the disallowance of the claim of exemption u/s 10B for late filing of the return of income. The decision highlighted the importance of following precedents and providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case, ultimately leading to a partial allowance of the Revenue's appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
