Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was afforded a reasonable opportunity to produce his books of account, produce evidence in support of the returns, and rebut the case set up by the Income-tax department, and whether the Tribunal was justified in refusing to refer that question as one of law.
Analysis: The notice to produce evidence under section 23(2) and the later notice to produce accounts and documents under section 22(4) were issued on short time. The assessee sought time, and the facts showed that he was not given a real opportunity to comply. The Court treated the adequacy of the opportunity and the sufficiency of time allowed to an assessee as a question of law capable of reference. The Tribunal's own observation that the assessee was not faced with the department's assumptions supported the contention that the matter raised a legal issue and not merely one of fact.
Conclusion: The assessee was not afforded a reasonable opportunity in the circumstances, and the Tribunal ought to have referred the question to the High Court under section 66(2).