Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether slit strips cleared during the manufacturing process were removed as such so as to attract reversal of Modvat credit and demand under the Central Excise law.
Analysis: The respondent used steel strips in the manufacture of steel tubes and, in the course of the process, slit and cut the strips to the required width. The disputed clearances were of unusable or defective slit strips, which had been treated in the classification declaration and registration certificate as strips and were cleared on payment of duty as a final product. The entire input had been issued for manufacture, and the material removed could not be regarded as inputs remaining as such. The view already taken in an identical matter was followed, holding that the goods were not cleared as such.
Conclusion: The clearance of slit strips did not amount to removal of inputs as such, and the demand and penalties were not sustainable.