1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Bangalore Remands Case for Further Review on CENVAT Credit Eligibility</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE remanded the case to the Commissioner (A) for further proceedings regarding the appellant's eligibility for CENVAT ... - Issues involved: Scrutiny of input services for CENVAT credit eligibility, irregular credit availed, examination conducted, prima facie satisfaction for pre-deposit relief, remand to Commissioner (A).In this judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE, the appellant's eligibility for CENVAT credit of tax paid on various input services was under scrutiny. The Commissioner (A) observed irregular credit availed but failed to provide details on the examination conducted. The appellant contended that they should satisfy the authority on the claims for each input service to seek relief on pre-deposit.The Tribunal noted that the materials on record needed testing at the prima facie stage and decided it was inappropriate to keep the appeal pending. Consequently, the appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (A) to reach a prima facie conclusion based on the merits of the case to make an appropriate order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Finance Act, 1994.Ultimately, the stay application was disposed of, and the appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (A) for further proceedings.