Rectification power under section 254(2) cannot be used to review, recall, or rehear an appellate order.

Section 254(2) confers only a limited rectification power to correct mistakes apparent from the record and does not allow review, recall, rehearing, or re-argument of the merits. A miscellaneous application cannot be used to raise a fresh ground not pressed earlier or to challenge the earlier appellate order on the basis of an alleged error in remand procedure. Recall is available only within the narrow framework of Rules 24 and 25 of the ITAT Rules in appropriate ex parte situations. As no rectifiable mistake was shown, the request to recall or modify the earlier order was not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Miscellaneous Application seeking recall or modification of the Tribunal's earlier order could be entertained under the rectification power, and whether any mistake apparent from the record justified reopening the appeal.

Analysis: The assessment had been made ex parte under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the assessee sought to reopen the earlier appellate order by contending that the first appellate authority could not remand the matter after the omission of such power under section 251 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is confined to correcting mistakes apparent from the record and does not permit review, recall, or rehearing of the entire matter. A party cannot use rectification proceedings to reargue the merits or raise a fresh ground that was not pressed earlier. The power to recall is available only within the limited framework of Rules 24 and 25 of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, in appropriate ex parte situations.

Conclusion: No rectifiable mistake apparent from the record was shown, and the request to recall or modify the earlier order was not maintainable under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

---