Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a person against whom a court proposes to make a complaint under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has a right to be heard before the court forms its opinion and directs prosecution.
Analysis: The power under Section 340 is exercised by the court only to decide whether it is expedient in the interest of justice that an inquiry should be made into an offence affecting the administration of justice. A preliminary inquiry, if held, is only to assist the court in forming that opinion; it is not an inquiry to determine guilt or innocence. The statutory scheme shows that the accused gets a right of hearing only after the complaint reaches the magistrate, where the matter proceeds as a warrant case and the accused may seek discharge under Sections 238 to 240. The availability of an appeal under Section 341 does not create any prior right of audience at the stage of making the complaint. Principles of natural justice are therefore not violated by the absence of notice or hearing before the complaint is directed.
Conclusion: The person proposed to be proceeded against has no right to be heard before the court makes a complaint under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the objection based on natural justice fails.
Ratio Decidendi: At the stage of Section 340 proceedings, the court only decides whether it is expedient in the interest of justice to direct an inquiry into an apparent offence, and no prior hearing to the proposed accused is statutorily required.