Writ jurisdiction cannot bypass Criminal Procedure remedies for transfer or further investigation when the case is already before court.

The writ petition seeking transfer of investigation and further investigation was not maintainable because the criminal process was already before the competent Magistrate or Sessions Court. The Court noted that the Code of Criminal Procedure assigns distinct functions to the police and the Magistrate: on a police report, the Magistrate may accept it, disagree with it, take cognizance, or direct further investigation. The informant may be heard when the Magistrate proposes to drop proceedings or decline action against some persons, but that does not create a right to invoke writ jurisdiction as a substitute for statutory remedies. As the appellant had not exhausted the remedies available under the Code, the High Court rightly declined interference.

---

---

Issues: Whether the writ petition seeking transfer of investigation and further investigation was maintainable when the criminal process was already before the competent Magistrate or Sessions Court, and whether the appellant could bypass the remedies available under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Analysis: The statutory scheme places distinct functions on the police and the Magistrate. On receipt of a police report, the Magistrate may accept it, disagree with it, take cognizance, or direct further investigation. The informant is entitled to notice and an opportunity of hearing when the Magistrate proposes to drop the proceeding or decline to proceed against some persons, but that does not confer a right to seek writ intervention as a matter of course. The Code also provides remedies through complaint procedure and the Magistrate's powers under Chapters XII and XV, and a writ petition is not the proper substitute for those remedies. Since the matter was already within the criminal court process and the appellant had not exhausted the remedies available in law, the High Court rightly declined interference.

Conclusion: The writ petition was not maintainable, and the challenge to the High Court's refusal to interfere failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the Code of Criminal Procedure provides specific remedies and confers power on the Magistrate to deal with police reports and further investigation, writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass that statutory mechanism.

---