Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be made where tax was deducted at source under section 194C, but the Revenue treated the payment as falling under section 194-I, resulting only in short deduction of tax.
Analysis: The payment was on account of hiring charges for barges/equipment. The Revenue treated the payment as hire of machinery/equipment and held section 194-I applicable, whereas the assessee had deducted tax under section 194C. The Tribunal followed the view that section 40(a)(ia) applies where tax is not deducted, and not where there is only a short deduction because of a bona fide difference of opinion as to the applicable TDS provision. In such a case, the proper course is to treat the assessee as in default under section 201 and recover the differential tax with interest, if payable.
Conclusion: Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not justified; the assessee succeeded on this issue and the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.