1996 (5) TMI 45 - HC - Income Tax

High Court Upholds Tribunal Decision on Income-tax Act Referral

The High Court upheld the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to not refer questions of law to the High Court under section 256(2) of the ... Agricultural Land, Finding Of Fact, Held By Assessee, Household Expenses, Question Of Law Issues:1. Refusal to refer questions of law to High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:The case involved an application by the Revenue under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seeking a direction for the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer two questions of law to the High Court. The questions pertained to the deletion of additions made on account of low household expenses and understatement of marriage expenses in the assessment year 1985-86 for the assessee, Bhanwar Lal. The Tribunal, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, refused to refer the questions to the High Court, stating that no question of law arose and the matter was based on factual considerations.The assessee, an individual, had his residence searched by the Income-tax Department under section 132 of the Act in 1987. Subsequently, the assessment for the year 1985-86 was completed by the Income-tax Officer, Central Circle, Jodhpur. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Jodhpur, partly allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside certain additions but confirming others related to marriage and household expenses. Both the Revenue and the assessee appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, where the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.The Tribunal, in its judgment, analyzed the statements recorded during the search and the circumstances under which they were provided. It noted that the questions posed to the assessee were limited, and the responses were estimates made under stress. Considering the evidence and arguments presented, the Tribunal concluded that there was no reasonable basis to uphold the additions of Rs. 35,000 and Rs. 15,000 for household and marriage expenses, respectively. The Tribunal's decision was based on an appreciation of evidence, leading to the conclusion that no question of law arose in the case.The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, citing a previous court ruling to support the refusal to refer questions of law based on factual considerations. The court determined that the Revenue's questions were purely factual and did not raise any legal issues. Consequently, the application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision not to refer the questions to the High Court.