1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal dismissed due to delay of almost 2 years, assesses failed to provide satisfactory explanation.</h1> The appeal was dismissed by the appellate tribunal due to a delay of over 1 year and 11 months in filing, with no satisfactory explanation provided by the ... Condonation of delay in filing appeal - delay of over 1 year and 11 months - service of notice - Held that: - The assessees had not intimated any change of address to the O/o Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) - In these circumstances, the submission of the assessees that they actually received the impugned order on 21.01.2011 when the recovery action was initiated, is not sufficient to hold that there is no delay in preferring of the above appeal. No satisfactory explanation has been given by the assessees for the delay - delay cannot be condoned - appeal is also dismissed as barred by limitation. The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal due to a delay of over 1 year and 11 months in filing, with no satisfactory explanation provided by the assesses. The appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation.