1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Improper Deduction Granting Decision Reversed</h1> The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) wrongly granted deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act, which was not admissible. The matter was remanded ... - Issues involved: Appeal against deletion of addition u/s 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by CIT(A).Facts:- Assessee company filed return declaring total income.- Providing information technology services to foreign clients.- Earned dividend income, long-term capital gain, and interest income.- Claimed deduction u/s 10B.- Certificate from STPI filed.- AO found discrepancies and lack of Board approval for 100% export-oriented undertaking.- AO disallowed claim u/s 10B.CIT(A) Decision:- Assessee furnished replies to discrepancies.- CIT(A) held conditions for u/s 10B fulfilled.- CIT(A) allowed exemption u/s 10B based on fulfillment of conditions.- AO's disallowance deleted.Appellant's Submission:- Confusion on whether claim made u/s 10A or 10B.- Claim revised to u/s 10A before AO.- Form 56F filed for u/s 10A.- Discrepancies argued as frivolous.- Delay in submission of Softex forms condoned.- No discrepancy in FIRC and turnover.- Claim under u/s 10A should have been granted.Tribunal Decision:- Assessee initially claimed u/s 10B, denied by AO.- CIT(A) granted deduction u/s 10B, not admissible.- Matter restored to CIT(A) for fresh consideration.- CIT(A) to determine entitlement to exemption u/s 10A and fulfillment of conditions.- Assessee to be given opportunity to be heard.Result:- Appeal treated as allowed for statistical purpose.