Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether municipal house tax paid by a tenant on behalf of the landlord is to be included in determining the annual value of property under the income-tax law.
Analysis: The expression "annual value" was treated as the sum for which the property might reasonably be expected to let from year to year. The amount a tenant is willing to pay for occupation was held to be the strongest evidence of that sum, and no distinction was accepted between rent reserved directly and an additional sum the tenant agrees to pay towards a liability of the landlord. The Court held that the statutory definition in the income-tax provision controlled the inquiry, and that the landlord's municipal tax liability paid by the tenant formed part of the amount for which the property might reasonably be expected to let. The existence of an express deduction for land revenue was treated as indicating that no similar implied deduction could be made for municipal house tax.
Conclusion: The tenant-paid municipal house tax is includible in computing annual value and is to be treated as part of the rent payable to the landlord.
Ratio Decidendi: In determining annual value under the property income provision, all amounts forming part of the tenant's consideration for occupation, including sums paid towards the landlord's statutory liability, are included unless expressly excluded by the statute.