TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the acquisition proceedings under Chapter XX-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were validly initiated and sustained on the facts, having regard to the fair market value, apparent consideration, encumbrances on the property, and the CBDT circular governing small-value transfers.
Analysis: The property was transferred through several sale deeds for an aggregate apparent consideration of Rs. 1,85,000, while the record disclosed significant encumbrances, long-standing tenancy at nominal rent, disputes over title, restricted possession, and portions affected by development considerations. The fair market value had to be determined from the standpoint of a prudent purchaser and all depressing factors were required to be considered. The competent authority and the Tribunal were also required to test whether the statutory preconditions for initiation under section 269C existed, including a valid basis for believing that the consideration was not truly stated and that the fair market value exceeded the apparent consideration by the statutory margin. The CBDT circular of 16 May 1986, applied to the existing Chapter XX-A regime, also supported non-initiation or dropping of proceedings where the apparent consideration was within the prescribed limit. On the facts, the property did not satisfy the statutory threshold for acquisition and the valuation process was found to be legally defective because relevant factors were ignored.
Conclusion: The acquisition proceedings were not sustainable and the dismissal of the appeal was warranted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For acquisition under Chapter XX-A to stand, the competent authority must determine fair market value by taking into account all material factors affecting price and must have a valid statutory basis under section 269C; if the relevant encumbrances and other depressing circumstances are ignored, the acquisition is vitiated.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
