Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Income-tax Officer could invoke section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to rectify the earlier order and withdraw the exclusion of income declared under section 3(1) of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976 was held to be clear. Section 3 applied only to qualifying declarants and qualifying income, section 8 granted immunity from inclusion in total income only subject to the statutory conditions, and the certificate issued under section 8(2) was conclusive only within the confines of that Act. On a plain reading of the provisions, persons whose income and source were already reflected in books and were otherwise outside the intended class of declarants could not claim the statutory benefit. The earlier order excluding the income from assessment was therefore contrary to the statute and amounted to a mistake apparent from the record, making rectification under section 154 permissible.
Conclusion: The Income-tax Officer was competent to invoke section 154 and the rectification was valid, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessees.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the legal position is clear on the face of the statutory provisions, an order granting an exclusion contrary to the statute constitutes a mistake apparent from the record and may be rectified under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.