Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court allows assessee's appeals, delays condoned. Reimbursed expenses /= income. Tax rate for pre-2003 projects 15%.</h1> <h3>M/s. Louis Berger International Inc., Versus Ass. Director of Income-tax</h3> The court allowed the appeals of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing appeals, ruling that reimbursed expenditure should not be treated as income, ... - Issues Involved:1. Condonation of delay in filing appeals.2. Treatment of reimbursed expenditure as income.3. Tax rate applicable to income from projects started before 1.4.2003.Condonation of Delay:At the outset, we note that these appeals were filed on 12.6.2012 by the assessee with a delay of 175 days. The assessee has filed a petition seeking condonation of delay which is also accompanied by a sworn affidavit by the authorised person. The petitioner was under the bona-fide impression that no appeal need be filed before the Hon'ble ITAT against the order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the I.T. Act pending the decision of the Hon'ble High Court on the admission of the appeal filed by the department. The courts and quasi-judicial bodies are moved to condone the delay if a litigant satisfies the court that there were sufficient reasons for delay. The expression 'sufficient cause or reasons' as provided in subsection (3) of section 249 of the IT Act is used in identical position as in the Limitation Act and CPC. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to condone the delay of 175 days and admit the appeals of the assessee.Treatment of Reimbursed Expenditure:The first ground is that the Assessing Officer erred in treating the expenditure reimbursed as the income of the assessee without considering the fact that earlier year the Tribunal held that the said reimbursable expenditure does not represent income of the assessee. After hearing both the parties, we are of the opinion that this issue came for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee's own case in ITA No. 1073 & 1074/Hyd/04 for A.Ys. 2000-01 and 2001-02 and ITA Nos. 720 & 725/Hyd/08 dated 30th January, 2010 for A.Ys. 2002-03 wherein held as follows: 'The reimbursable expenditure received by the assessee cannot form part of the total income.' Respectfully following the above order of the Tribunal for earlier year (cited supra) we are inclined to allow the ground taken by the assessee for these assessment years also as the facts and circumstances of the present assessment years before us are similar to that was considered by this Tribunal in earlier assessment years. This ground of the assessee is allowed in all the three appeals i.e., ITA Nos. 937 to 939/Hyd/2012.Tax Rate Applicable to Income from Projects Started Before 1.4.2003:Now coming to the second ground that the Assessing Officer erred in taxing the assessee in respect of income derived from the project started before 1.4.2003 at 20% as against the rate applicable at 15%, this ground is also adjudicated in the earlier order of the Tribunal in assessee's own case in ITA No. 1250/Hyd/2011 dated 25th October, 2011 for assessment year 2006-07 wherein it was held that the fee for technical services falls under Article 12 of DTAA and not under article 7 of DTAA and tax has to be levied at 15%. Respectfully following the above order of the Tribunal for A.Y. 2006-07, we are inclined to allow the ground taken by the assessee.Conclusion:In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed.Order pronounced in the open court on 2/11/2012.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found