TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal directs Assessing Officer to allocate expenses based on work in progress figures</h1> <h3>Kukreja Construction Co Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 31, Mumbai</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to allocate indirect expenses based on work in progress figures for various ... - Issues involved: Allocation of indirect expenses against profit from a specific project u/s 80-IB of the Income Tax Act.Summary:The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2005-06, where the assessee, engaged in real estate development, declared a profit from the project 'Orchid' and claimed deduction u/s 80-IB. The Assessing Officer disallowed certain expenses, attributing 85% of indirect expenses to the Orchid project. The CIT(A) upheld this allocation method. The assessee appealed to the Tribunal, citing a previous order in a similar case where indirect expenses were apportioned based on work in progress. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to verify work in progress figures and allocate indirect expenses accordingly. The appeal was allowed in part.In conclusion, the Tribunal held that indirect expenses should be apportioned in proportion to the cost incurred on various projects during the year, based on work in progress data, following a previous order. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification and appropriate allocation of expenses.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
