Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant's share of global advertising expenses paid to an overseas group company was includible in the value of imported goods under Rule 10(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007.
Analysis: The allocation of advertising costs was made on the basis of global sales turnover and not by reference to the imports made by the appellant. The record did not show any documentary or other evidence establishing a nexus between the import transactions and the advertising expenditure. The payment was for a global advertising campaign benefiting the group as a whole, and it was not shown to be a condition of sale of the imported goods. In the absence of a nexus or condition-of-sale relationship, the amount could not be treated as an additional element of the import price under the valuation rule invoked.
Conclusion: The advertising cost-sharing payment was not includible in the assessable value of the imported goods, and the addition made by the department was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the impugned valuation enhancement was set aside with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made towards shared global advertising expenses is not includible in customs assessable value unless it is shown to have a direct nexus with the import and to constitute a condition of sale of the imported goods.