1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court affirms tax assessment on society's donations, stresses donor scrutiny for genuineness</h1> The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the appeal against the assessment ... - Issues involved: Appeal against order affirming assessment made by Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding donations to a society.Assessment by Assessing Authority: The Assessing Authority assessed the society, disregarding donations and deeming donors as bogus. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) reversed the assessment, stating donors were not examined or cross-examined to determine their authenticity. Emphasized that if donors were found to be bogus, society's registration u/s 12AA could be canceled.Decision of Appellate Tribunal: Appellate Tribunal agreed with Commissioner's view, noting donors were not examined or cross-examined. Held that society, being registered u/s 12AA, was entitled to exemption u/s 11 of the Income-tax Act. Tribunal emphasized the necessity of examining donors to establish the genuineness of donations.High Court's Analysis: High Court scrutinized findings of Commissioner and Tribunal, concluding that donations could not be labeled as bogus without donor examination and cross-examination. Emphasized the importance of evidence in determining genuineness. Noted that society's registration was not revoked despite donor authenticity concerns, allowing it to claim exemption u/s 11. High Court upheld the decisions of Commissioner and Tribunal, dismissing the appeal.