Taxpayer's Appeals Allowed on Securities Revaluation Losses for Assessment Years 2000-01 to 2003-04

The Tribunal allowed the taxpayer's appeals, overturning the disallowance of loss on the revaluation of securities for the assessment years 2000-01 to 2003-04. Relying on Kerala HC judgments and RBI guidelines, the Tribunal held that the taxpayer's valuation method based on YTM was acceptable since no alternative valuation formula was provided by the assessing officer. The orders disallowing the loss were set aside, directing the assessing authority to permit the claimed loss on securities revaluation. (Order pronounced on September 18, 2012)

---

---

Issues: Disallowance of loss on revaluation of securities

Analysis:
1. The taxpayer's appeals were against the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax for the assessment years 2000-01 to 2003-04. The main issue was the disallowance of loss on the revaluation of securities.

2. The taxpayer's representative argued that the loss claimed was due to the revaluation of securities as per RBI norms, but the assessing officer disallowed the claim. The Tribunal directed a reconsideration, but the assessing officer again disallowed the claim citing the absence of balance-sheets from the respective companies. The taxpayer argued that the valuation was based on RBI guidelines and realizable value, as supported by Kerala High Court judgments.

3. The Departmental Representative contended that without the balance-sheets of the companies, the taxpayer couldn't claim any loss on revaluation.

4. The Tribunal considered whether the taxpayer's notional loss on securities revaluation was deductible. Citing the Kerala High Court's judgment in a similar case, it held that the loss should be allowed as a deduction in computing taxable profits.

5. The Tribunal noted that the taxpayer valued the securities based on RBI guidelines and realizable value, as they couldn't obtain balance-sheets. Referring to the Kerala High Court's stance on valuation methods, the Tribunal upheld the taxpayer's claim, as the assessing authority didn't provide an alternative valuation formula.

6. The RBI guidelines recommended valuing unquoted shares using the Yield to Maturity (YTM) method. The Kerala High Court supported this method, emphasizing the lack of a suggested formula by the assessing officer for market value computation. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the assessing authority to allow the taxpayer's claimed loss on securities revaluation.

7. Consequently, all the taxpayer's appeals were allowed, and the orders disallowing the loss on securities revaluation were set aside, following the Kerala High Court judgments.

Order pronounced on September 18, 2012.

---