Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (6) TMI 932 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Deductible brokerage expenses approved, unexplained jewelry addition upheld. ITA No.1358/PN/2013 dismissed. The Tribunal allowed the brokerage expenses claimed by the assessee as deductible under Section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act, finding them justified and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Deductible brokerage expenses approved, unexplained jewelry addition upheld. ITA No.1358/PN/2013 dismissed.

                          The Tribunal allowed the brokerage expenses claimed by the assessee as deductible under Section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act, finding them justified and incurred wholly and exclusively for the land transfer. The Tribunal upheld the addition of unexplained jewelry, as the assessee failed to provide evidence supporting the claim. As a result, ITA No.1358/PN/2013 was dismissed, while all other appeals filed by the respective assessees were allowed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of brokerage expenses claimed as deduction under Section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Addition on account of unexplained jewelry found during the search.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Brokerage Expenses Claimed as Deduction under Section 48(i):

                          Facts:
                          The assessee, an individual, filed returns disclosing total income after a search and seizure action. During assessment, the AO noted that brokerage was paid to M/s. Regenesis PMCPL, a related party, for the sale of land. The AO disallowed the brokerage, considering it a tax avoidance measure.

                          Arguments by Assessee:
                          - The brokerage was paid as per an MOU with Regenesis PMCPL to find a joint venture partner for land development.
                          - Regenesis PMCPL, a subsidiary of KPDL, employed professionals to secure a joint venture with ICICI Ventures.
                          - The brokerage rate was reasonable (0.5%-1.5%) compared to market rates (2%).
                          - The assessee argued that the transaction was legitimate and not a tax avoidance device.

                          Arguments by AO:
                          - The brokerage payment to Regenesis PMCPL was seen as a colorable device to reduce tax liability.
                          - The AO noted that Regenesis PMCPL showed losses or nominal incomes, suggesting the arrangement was to minimize tax.
                          - The AO disallowed the brokerage, stating the assessee did not need a broker from a related party for the transaction.

                          CIT(A) Findings:
                          - The CIT(A) upheld the AO's disallowance, stating the brokerage was not linked to the land transfer but to finding an investment partner.
                          - The CIT(A) noted the sale price received was at market value, not higher, and thus the brokerage was not justified.
                          - The CIT(A) found no documentary evidence of services rendered by Regenesis PMCPL.

                          Tribunal's Decision:
                          - The Tribunal allowed the brokerage expenses, finding the payment justified and incurred wholly and exclusively for the land transfer.
                          - The Tribunal noted Regenesis PMCPL employed qualified professionals and facilitated the sale at a higher price.
                          - The Tribunal observed that Regenesis PMCPL paid substantial taxes on its income, and the assessee paid service tax on the brokerage, negating the tax avoidance claim.
                          - The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the disallowance of brokerage expenses.

                          2. Addition on Account of Unexplained Jewelry:

                          Facts:
                          During the search, gold jewelry was found, and the AO disallowed part of it as unexplained.

                          Arguments by Assessee:
                          - The jewelry was received as gifts and purchased over time.
                          - The assessee relied on CBDT instructions for explaining the jewelry.

                          Arguments by AO:
                          - The AO considered only a part of the jewelry as explained, disallowing the rest due to lack of satisfactory explanation.

                          CIT(A) Findings:
                          - The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, noting the assessee failed to substantiate the claim with records.
                          - The CIT(A) found the AO's allowance of part of the jewelry reasonable and in line with CBDT instructions.

                          Tribunal's Decision:
                          - The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no infirmity.
                          - The Tribunal noted the assessee could not provide evidence for the unexplained jewelry, sustaining the addition.

                          Conclusion:
                          - The Tribunal allowed the brokerage expenses as deductible under Section 48(i), finding them justified and incurred wholly and exclusively for the transfer.
                          - The Tribunal upheld the addition of unexplained jewelry due to lack of evidence from the assessee.

                          Result:
                          - ITA No.1358/PN/2013 was dismissed.
                          - All other appeals filed by the respective assessees were allowed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found