1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Deduction of Interest Payment Allowed for Business Purposes</h1> The High Court allowed the deduction of interest payment against share income from a partnership firm, ruling that the borrowing was for business ... - Issues:1. Deduction of interest payment, audit fees, and stationery expenses against share income from a partnership firm.Analysis:The case involved the deduction of interest payment, audit fees, and stationery expenses against the share income of the assessee from a partnership firm. The assessee had claimed deductions for interest paid on borrowings for investment, audit fees, and stationery expenses against her share of profit from the partnership firm. The Income-tax Officer initially disallowed the claim, stating that all expenditure had to be claimed in the firm's assessment. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the deduction, considering the interest paid as specifically borrowed for investment in the partnership firm. The Appellate Tribunal, on the other hand, reversed the decision, stating that the capital invested in the partnership firm could have been sourced from the assessee's own funds and not necessarily from borrowings.The Appellate Tribunal's decision was based on the belief that the assessee had adequate resources to invest in the partnership firm without borrowing. However, the High Court disagreed with this view, emphasizing that the source of funds used for investment was not relevant as long as the interest paid was in respect of capital borrowed for the business. The Court held that the borrowing was for the purpose of the business, making the interest payment an allowable deduction. The Tribunal's decision was deemed erroneous in this regard.Regarding the audit fees and stationery expenses, the High Court found no basis for allowing these deductions against the share income. The Court noted that such expenses were related to the computation of the firm's income and would have been allowed in the firm's assessment. Therefore, the Court concluded that these expenses were personal in nature and not directly connected to the income derived from the partnership firm. As a result, the audit fees and stationery expenses were rightly disallowed as deductions.In conclusion, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the interest payment deduction but upheld the disallowance of audit fees and stationery expenses. The Court awarded costs to the assessee due to the success of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
