Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal before the Tribunal was maintainable when the dispute arose out of a rebate claim on export of goods and whether the Commissioner (Appeals) could remit the matter for verification of documents.
Analysis: The appeal was directed against an order dealing with rebate of excise duty on exported goods. The Tribunal noted that the order-in-original contained categorical findings on merits allowing rebate, and that the dispute essentially related to rebate on export goods. In that context, the Tribunal held that the present appeal was not maintainable before it. The observations also indicated that, in view of the nature of the dispute, there was no need for remand by the Commissioner (Appeals), though the appeal was disposed of on the ground of maintainability.
Conclusion: The appeal was held to be not maintainable and was dismissed.