Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the assessee's accounts and the restoration of the Income-tax Officer's estimate of profit from the country spirit business at the same percentage as in the preceding year were justified.
Analysis: The accounts produced by the assessee were found unreliable and not capable of yielding true profits. In such a situation, the proviso to section 13 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 empowered the Income-tax Officer to compute income upon such basis and in such manner as he thought fit. Past assessment history and previous returns of the assessee were relevant material for making an honest estimate, and there was no rule of law that prohibited the adoption of the same percentage of profit as in the earlier year, provided the estimate was not arbitrary and was based on some material.
Conclusion: The estimate of profit was validly made and the question referred was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The assessment based on estimated profits from the country liquor business was upheld and the Tribunal's order restoring the Income-tax Officer's estimate was affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where accounts are rejected as unreliable, the taxing authority may determine income on the basis of a reasonable and honest estimate, including reliance on past assessment records, so long as the estimate is supported by some material and is not purely arbitrary.