Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Design No. 146498 dated 5 January 1978 was liable to cancellation on the grounds of prior publication in India and absence of novelty or originality.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under the Designs Act, 1911 protects only a design that is new or original and not previously published in India. Publication, for this purpose, means disclosure of the design to the public so that it is no longer secret. The Court applied the ocular test and compared the registered design with earlier materials, including an earlier patent specification, prior foreign match boxes brought into India, and magazine publications. It found that the same rectangular pattern with multiple diamond-shaped spots had already been disclosed before the registration date. The Court also held that the claimed grooves and projections were only functional features and a mere mechanical device, not the protectable novelty of the design. Since the identical design had been previously applied to match boxes, the registered design lacked novelty and originality.
Conclusion: The design was liable to be cancelled on both grounds of prior publication and want of novelty or originality, and the cancellation petition succeeded.