Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a civil suit could be maintained to challenge an assessment order passed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, violation of natural justice, and alleged mala fides.
Analysis: Section 293 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 expressly bars suits in civil courts to set aside or modify proceedings taken or orders made under the Act. The assessment order was passed by the competent income-tax authority under the Act after recording statements under section 131, giving the petitioner an opportunity of cross-examination, and considering the reply to the show-cause notice. The challenge raised by the petitioner required factual investigation and did not disclose any patent lack of jurisdiction or facial nullity. The Income-tax Act provides a complete machinery for challenge to assessment orders, and the existence of that statutory remedy excludes recourse to a civil suit.
Conclusion: The civil suit was not maintainable and the bar under section 293 applied; the challenge to the assessment order had to be pursued only under the statutory remedy provided by the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Final Conclusion: The revision failed, and the refusal of interim protection against recovery was left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment order is made under the Income-tax Act, 1961 by a competent authority and no facial nullity or patent want of jurisdiction is shown, section 293 bars a civil suit and the assessee must pursue the statutory appellate remedy.