Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment made on the receiver, after substitution for the executors at his own request pursuant to the High Court's order, was sustainable in law for the assessment year 1944-45.
Analysis: The assessment had been initiated against the executors in respect of income accruing during their administration of the estate, and the relevant income had not been received by the receiver. The High Court's order merely permitted the receiver to apply for substitution in pending proceedings; it did not, by itself, authorise a substitution which the Income-tax Act did not permit. There was no provision in the Act enabling a receiver appointed later to be substituted in place of the executors in such an assessment proceeding. The receiver's request for substitution, made pursuant to the High Court's order, could not create liability by estoppel or validate an assessment otherwise unauthorised by statute.
Conclusion: The assessment was not sustainable in law. The answer to the referred question was in the negative, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Income-tax Act does not authorise substitution of a newly appointed receiver for executors already proceeded against, a substitution made at the receiver's request cannot validate an assessment otherwise lacking statutory sanction.