Strict construction of motor vehicle tax law bars additional tax for isolated overloading beyond permit limits.

Additional tax under section 8 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 could not be imposed on a stage carriage merely because it occasionally carried more passengers than permitted by the transport permit. The tax liability depended on the vehicle's permitted passenger capacity and on whether the vehicle was altered or proposed to be used so as to fall within a higher taxable category; stray overloading did not change its tax classification. Any breach of permit conditions was separately dealt with under the Motor Vehicles Act, including permit cancellation or suspension, but not by additional tax under section 8. The taxing provision had to be construed strictly, and the contrary revenue view was disapproved.

---

---

Issues: Whether additional tax under section 8 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 could be levied on a stage carriage merely because, on some occasions, it carried more passengers than the maximum number permitted under the transport permit.

Analysis: The tax under the Act was based on the number of passengers the vehicle was permitted to carry, not on the number actually carried on isolated occasions. Section 8 applied only when a vehicle was altered or proposed to be used so as to become a vehicle liable to a higher rate of tax. Occasional overloading did not alter the character of the vehicle or bring it within any higher taxable category under the Schedule. The words limiting liability by reference to the number of passengers the vehicle was permitted to carry could not be ignored, and a taxing provision had to be construed strictly. Any breach of the permit conditions was separately remediable under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, including cancellation or suspension of the permit under section 60, but not by imposing additional tax under section 8.

Conclusion: Additional tax under section 8 was not leviable for stray instances of carrying excess passengers. The contention of the revenue failed, and the levy was unjustified.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the contrary view previously taken was disapproved, and the authorities were restrained from levying additional tax for occasional overloading of the stage carriage.

Ratio Decidendi: A taxing provision imposing additional tax on a motor vehicle cannot be invoked for isolated breaches of permit conditions unless the vehicle is brought, by alteration or proposed user, into a category that is itself subject to a higher rate of tax under the statute.

---