Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal could, in the assessee's appeal, suo motu go into the question of the quantum of payment made to a third party when that finding of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had not been challenged by the department.
Analysis: The appellate power of the Tribunal under section 33(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act extends to the subject-matter of the appeal, read with the grounds raised by the appellant, any additional grounds permitted, and any cross-contentions properly advanced by the respondent under the relevant rules. The expression "thereon" limits the Tribunal to matters that are actually in dispute before it. On the record, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had found that the assessee had paid Rs. 3 lakhs, and that finding was not shown to have been assailed by the Income-tax Officer or the departmental representative. The assessee's appeal challenged only the adverse conclusion that the payment was capital in nature. The Tribunal therefore could not enlarge the controversy on its own and re-open the unchallenged factual finding as to the amount paid.
Conclusion: The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine suo motu the quantum of payment, and the question referred was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal's jurisdiction in appeal is confined to the subject-matter raised by the appeal and any proper response to it; it cannot, without a challenge from the other side, reopen an uncontroverted finding and decide an issue not put in dispute before it.