TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a partnership firm carrying on jewellery business can claim valid registration or continuation of registration when the gold licence stands only in the name of one partner, and whether such use of the partner's licence by the firm violates the licensing provisions under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 and the Rules.
Analysis: Section 27 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 prohibits carrying on business as a dealer without a valid licence, and section 2(h) treats a firm as a dealer where it carries on the gold business. On the admitted facts, the business was carried on by the firm, but no licence stood in the firm's name. A licence issued to an individual partner could not be used by the partnership firm to conduct the business, because Rule 7 of the Gold Control (Forms, Fees and Miscellaneous Matters) Rules, 1968 makes the licence non-transferable and non-saleable. The use of a partner's licence by the firm amounts to an impermissible transfer otherwise of the licence.
Conclusion: The firm was in violation of the licensing provisions, and the Revenue's objection to registration succeeded. The answer to the substantive question was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory licence granted to an individual partner cannot be treated as a licence of the partnership firm where the firm is the dealer carrying on the business, and such use of the partner's licence by the firm amounts to an impermissible transfer under the licensing rules.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
