Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether income returned by the assessee but left unassessed in the individual assessment, and later found excluded from the family assessment, could be treated as income that had "escaped assessment" so as to attract section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The Court construed the expression "escaped assessment" in section 34 in its ordinary and wider sense. It held that the phrase is not confined to cases where income was omitted from the return altogether, but also covers cases where income was returned yet, for any reason, was not charged in the final assessment, including where an appellate or revisional order later cancels an earlier assessment. The Court relied on the language of section 34, especially the words "for any reason", and read the Privy Council decision as not limiting the provision to non-disclosure by the assessee alone. It also held that the scheme of revision and rectification provisions did not exclude section 34 from operating in such cases.
Conclusion: The income had escaped assessment within section 34, and the notice and reassessment were valid. The answer to the referred question under section 66(2) was in the affirmative.
Ratio Decidendi: Income may be said to have "escaped assessment" under section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 when it is not brought to tax in the final assessment for any reason, including an erroneous exclusion by the Income-tax Officer or cancellation of an earlier assessment on appeal.