ITAT Chennai adjusts transfer pricing, sets ALP at 18% for AY 2009-10

The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the assessee's appeal in a transfer pricing adjustment case for the assessment year 2009-10. The ALP was set at 18%, providing relief to the assessee compared to the initial adjustment proposed by the TPO and revised by the DRP. The ITAT considered industry profit margins and the challenges in finding appropriate comparables, leading to the decision to reduce the ALP. The Assessing Officer was directed to issue a consequential order based on the revised ALP of 18%.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Transfer pricing adjustment under Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2009-10.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Background and Assessment by AO:
The appeal pertains to an assessment for the year 2009-10 where the Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax made a transfer pricing adjustment of `3,08,00,388 under section 143(3) r.w.s 92CA r.w.s 144(C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a company providing corporate information and IT enabled services, had related party transactions with entities in the UK, USA, Hong Kong, and Japan totaling `30,17,69,910. The Assessing Officer referred the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to ascertain the Arm's Length Price (ALP).

2. TPO's Analysis and Adjustments:
The TPO used the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) to benchmark the profit margin of the assessee's related receipts. Initially, 13 comparables were selected, but after exclusions and additions, only six comparables remained. The TPO proposed to enhance the assessee's Profit Level Indicator (PLI) to 27.3%, resulting in a differential adjustment of `3.57 crores. The TPO's order was passed on 10.1.2013, and a draft assessment order was issued on 28.2.2013.

3. Objections and DRP's Directions:
The assessee raised objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) challenging the comparability of certain entities. The DRP accepted some objections and revised the PLI to 24.3%, resulting in an addition to the income. The assessee appealed against this order.

4. Judicial Review and Decision:
The ITAT Chennai heard the parties and analyzed the case details. It noted the nature of the assessee's business, the selection of TNMM, and the disputed comparables in the IT enabled services/BPO domain. The ITAT observed that both the assessee and the Revenue failed to find sufficient appropriate comparables. Considering the profit margins in the industry and the difficulty in finding suitable comparables, the ITAT decided to set the ALP at 18%, between the assessee's 13.47% and the Revenue's 24.3%. The assessee's grounds challenging the comparability of certain entities were rejected, but it received partial relief with the ALP reduction.

5. Conclusion:
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to pass a consequential order based on the revised ALP of 18%. The decision was pronounced on 11th November 2014 in Chennai.

This detailed analysis covers the issues involved in the legal judgment regarding transfer pricing adjustments under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2009-10, providing a comprehensive overview of the background, TPO's analysis, objections raised, DRP's directions, judicial review, and the final decision by the ITAT Chennai.

---