2007 (2) TMI 93 - HC - Income Tax

Tribunal Allows Deduction of Cash Expenditure Disallowed by Assessing Officer

The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of cash expenditure disallowed by the Assessing Officer under section ... Business Expenditure – Assessee claimed expenditure of Rs. 35,800 on account of purchase made in cash, but AO disallowed u/s 40A(3) of ITA, 1961 – Held that AO was not correct and allowed assessee claimed Issues:Interpretation of section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding cash expenditure disallowed by the Assessing Officer.Analysis:The case involved a question of law referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the applicability of section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal considered the facts where the assessee claimed an expenditure of Rs. 35,800 on cash purchases, which were disallowed by the Assessing Officer under section 40A. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) accepted the assessee's explanation, and this decision was upheld by the Tribunal in further appeal by the Revenue.The Revenue argued that the findings of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal were perverse as the explanation provided by the assessee for the cash payments was deemed insufficient and unacceptable. The Revenue contended that due to a clear violation of section 40A(3) of the Act, the assessee should not be entitled to the deduction of the cash spent.Upon reviewing the Tribunal's order, it was observed that the assessee purchased coal from truck owners on a cash basis due to special circumstances like coal being in short supply and the truck owners not having bank accounts. The genuineness of the transactions was not in dispute. The Tribunal referred to rule 6DD of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, which provides relaxation regarding section 40A(3). The Tribunal accepted the explanation given by the assessee, emphasizing that even if there could be a different opinion on the facts, the court would not substitute its opinion as long as the view accepted by the lower authorities was reasonable.Consequently, the question referred was answered in favor of the assessee, and the reference was disposed of accordingly.