Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessees granted exemption under Section 54 for new residential flats received</h1> <h3>Vilma Mary Pereira & Mr. Peter Savio Pereira Versus. ITO 19 (3) (3)</h3> The Tribunal concluded that the assessees were entitled to the deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act for the new residential flats received as ... Disallowance of claim of deduction u/s.54(1) in respect of residential flats acquired by the assessees in consideration of old house sold to the builder - Held that:- It is clear from the above that residential house was given to the assessee in consideration of the sale of old house. The sale consideration was partly received in cash and partly in the form of new flats to be constructed on the plot of old house sold by assessee. The new flats agreed to be given to assessee amounts to investment by assessee in residential house. Therefore, the AO was not justified in adding back the additional consideration given in the form of allotment of three flats by declining claim of deduction u/s.54 of the I.T.Act. In the present case before us, the assessee has purchased/constructed the new residential property and paid the consideration equivalent of price by payment in kind. Therefore, the assessee is entitled for exemption u/s.54 of I.T.Act, 1961 in respect of these flats. An issue was also raised by the AO with regard to sharing of 3 flats between the co-owners of the property and the exemption u/s.54 allowable in case of investment in one residential flat only. In this regard, we found that the details of allocation of area of new residential property between co-owners is already on record of the AO as well as in the valuation report. Furthermore, the co-owner will get the area according to their ratio in the new residential property. Since flat no.301 & 302 are situated in the same floor and adjacent to each other and will be treated as one single residential unit for the purpose of claiming exemption u/s.54. Thus we do not find any merit in the action of the AO for decline of claim of deduction u/s.54 in respect of residential flats allotted by builder in consideration of sale of old house. - Decided in favour of assessee Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of claim of deduction under Section 54(1) of the I.T. Act.2. Treatment of additional consideration in the form of new flats.3. Compliance with conditions laid down in Section 54.4. Allocation of new residential property between co-owners.5. Definition and interpretation of the term 'purchase' under Section 54.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of Claim of Deduction under Section 54(1):The common grievance in both appeals pertains to the disallowance of the claim of deduction under Section 54(1) concerning residential flats acquired by the assessees in consideration of an old house sold to a builder. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) observed that the additional consideration in the form of new flats was not included in the total consideration for computing Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG). The A.O. held that the new flats and car parking spaces received by the assessee were additional consideration and not eligible for exemption under Section 54 since they were not purchased or constructed by the assessee within the stipulated period.2. Treatment of Additional Consideration in the Form of New Flats:The A.O. argued that the new flats received should be treated as additional consideration for the sale of the old property. The A.O. contended that the flats were neither purchased nor constructed by the assessee, thus not fulfilling the conditions for exemption under Section 54. The A.O. added the market value of the new flats to the total consideration for the sale of the property.3. Compliance with Conditions Laid Down in Section 54:The A.O. emphasized that for availing exemption under Section 54, the assessee must have purchased a new flat one year before or two years after the date of transfer or constructed a new residential house within three years from the date of transfer. The A.O. held that the flats received as additional consideration did not meet these conditions, thereby denying the exemption.4. Allocation of New Residential Property Between Co-Owners:An issue was raised regarding the sharing of new flats between the co-owners and the exemption under Section 54 allowable for investment in one residential flat only. The allocation of new residential property was detailed, showing the ratio and area allotted to each co-owner. The Tribunal found that the allocation was in line with the co-owners' respective shares and that adjacent flats on the same floor could be treated as a single residential unit for claiming exemption under Section 54.5. Definition and Interpretation of the Term 'Purchase' under Section 54:The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's definition of 'purchase' in the case of CIT vs. T.N. Aravinda Reddy, which includes buying for a price or equivalent of price by payment in kind or adjustment towards an old debt. The Tribunal held that the assessee had effectively 'purchased' the new residential property by paying the consideration in kind, thereby fulfilling the conditions for exemption under Section 54.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the residential house given to the assessee in consideration of the sale of the old house amounted to an investment in a new residential house. The Tribunal found that the A.O. was not justified in adding back the additional consideration and denying the deduction under Section 54. The Tribunal also addressed the issue of allocation between co-owners, finding that adjacent flats could be treated as a single residential unit. Consequently, the appeals of both assessees were allowed, granting them the exemption under Section 54 for the new residential flats received.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found