Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal challenging reduction of Cenvat credit, enhancement of penalty and imposition of penalty on the authorised signatory survived after the assessee's appeal against the same adjudication order had already been allowed and the entire demand, interest and penalty had been set aside on limitation.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the assessee's appeal against the very same order had earlier resulted in setting aside of the entire duty demand, interest and penalty on the ground of time bar. Once the foundational adjudication order itself had been annulled, the Revenue's grievances on the quantum of credit, quantum of penalty and penalty on the authorised signatory could not independently remain for adjudication.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was held to be infructuous and was dismissed.