Penalty in reassessment proceedings remains available where the original assessment involved concealment or non-compliance under the Act

Penalty under the Income-tax Act, 1922 was considered available in reassessment proceedings where the default related to the original assessment. Section 28 was read as authorising penalty when, in the course of proceedings under the Act, the authority is satisfied that the assessee failed to furnish a return, failed to comply with notices, or concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars. Section 34 reopening was treated as part of the assessment machinery for the same assessee and assessment period, and not as a proceeding that excludes penalty jurisdiction merely because the default arose earlier. The stated conclusion was that penalty could validly be imposed and the matter favoured the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 could validly be imposed in proceedings reopened under section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 for defaults or concealment connected with the original assessment proceedings.

Analysis: Section 28 empowers penalty where, in the course of any proceedings under the Act, the authority is satisfied that the assessee has failed to furnish a return, failed to comply with notices, or concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars. The reopening under section 34 does not create a wholly separate and unrelated proceeding for the purposes of penalty; it remains linked to the assessment machinery for the same assessee and the same assessment period. Even on the assumption that section 34 proceedings are distinct, the statutory language of section 28 does not confine penalty to defaults committed only within the reopened proceedings, because the relevant requirement is the authority's satisfaction in the course of proceedings under the Act that a penal default has occurred.

Conclusion: Penalty under section 28 was held to be legally valid in section 34 proceedings, and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessees.

Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, proceedings under section 34 are not excluded from the penalty jurisdiction merely because the default arose in earlier assessment proceedings, so long as the authority is satisfied in the course of proceedings under the Act.

---