Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit in view of the exemption notification and the subsequent clarificatory notification governing production of the requisite certificate at the time of import.
Analysis: The demand arose from alleged non-compliance with the certificate condition under Notification No. 13/2010 dated 19-2-2010. The subsequent Notification No. 84/2010 dated 27-8-2010 was treated as continuing the earlier notification and as removing difficulty by clarifying the manner of compliance. On a prima facie view, production of a certificate from the proper authority was considered a mandatory condition, but the later notification appeared clarificatory in nature. In these circumstances, directing pre-deposit was considered likely to cause undue hardship pending final adjudication.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted in favour of the appellant during pendency of the appeal or until 30-9-2014, whichever was earlier.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was not finally decided on merits, but interim relief was granted by suspending the pre-deposit requirement.
Ratio Decidendi: A clarificatory notification issued to remove difficulty in implementing an earlier exemption notification may justify waiver of pre-deposit where a prima facie case and undue hardship are shown.