Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the properties purchased in the names of the assessee's wife and minor children, where the consideration was provided by the assessee and no independent source of funds was shown, amounted to a transfer of assets otherwise than for adequate consideration within section 9(2)(a)(iv) of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950.
Analysis: The statutory language of section 9(2)(a)(iv) was applied to include assets transferred directly or indirectly to a minor child otherwise than for adequate consideration in the computation of agricultural income. The Tribunal's finding that the purchase price substantially came from the assessee, while the wife and minor children had no independent source of funds, was accepted. The alleged repayment by instalments was treated only as a submission and not as material evidence sufficient to alter the character of the transaction. The earlier appellate records also did not support any case that the transfers were for adequate consideration or from an independent source of the transferees.
Conclusion: The transaction fell within section 9(2)(a)(iv) and the question was answered in the affirmative against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee provides the consideration for property purchased in the names of wife or minor children and no independent source or adequate consideration is proved, the transfer is includible under section 9(2)(a)(iv) of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950.