Third-party loose papers and untested statements cannot by themselves sustain income-tax additions without reliable corroboration.

Additions based on loose papers seized from third parties and statements recorded without cross-examination were held unsustainable. The loose papers were not books of account regularly kept in the course of business, so their evidentiary value was limited, and the presumption under section 132(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could not be extended against an assessee when the documents were not found in the assessee's possession. The Tribunal also relied on factual inconsistencies and the revenue's failure to establish the alleged cash payments with reliable evidence. On those facts, the deletion of the additions was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was right in deleting the additions of Rs. 20 lakhs and Rs. 25 lakhs made on the basis of loose papers seized from third parties and statements recorded behind the assessee's back.

Analysis: The additions were founded on loose papers recovered from the premises of third parties and on statements recorded from persons who were not made available for cross-examination. Such loose papers were not treated as books of account regularly kept in the course of business, and their evidentiary value was therefore limited. The presumption under section 132(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could not be extended against the assessee when the documents were not found from the assessee's possession. The Tribunal further found inconsistencies in the narration of the transactions and held that the revenue had not established the alleged cash payments with reliable evidence. The findings were factual and no perversity was shown.

Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in deleting the additions, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Additions cannot be sustained merely on the basis of loose papers seized from a third party and statements recorded without affording cross-examination, and the presumption under section 132(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is confined to the person from whose possession the documents are recovered.

---